In 1943, Karl Terzaghi expanded on Prantl's 1921 study on the penetration of hard bodies on softer materials, the plastic failure theory. Terzaghi used this theory to determine the bearing capacity of soils for shallow strip footing.
Calculation
Inputs
Saturated soil unit weight
:19kN/m3
Output
(General) - qu(net)
:620kPa
(Local) - qu(net)
:213kPa
Explanation
According to Terzaghi, a foundation is considered shallow if the footing depth, D, is less than or equal to its width, B. Additionally, he assumed that a uniform surcharge, q = γDf can replace the weight of soil above the base of the footing.
Terzaghi's bearing capacity equations are based on the following assumptions:
- The width of the foundation is equal or greater than its depth (i.e. B > D)
- No sliding between foundation and soil
- The soil beneath the foundation is a homogenous, semi-infinite mass
- The general shear failure governs
- No applied moments
- The applied load is compressive and is vertically applied to the foundation centroid
Terzaghi's equation consists of three components:
- the cohesion of the soil edge,
- the surcharge,
- the friction along the soil edge.
Combining these three together, gives the general equation:
qu=KccNc+KqqNq+Kγγc BNγ where:qu = ultimate bearing capacityγc =unit weight of soilB = width of the footing c = soil cohesionNγ = factor for unit weight of soilNc = factor of soil cohesionNq = factor of overburden pressureq = overburden pressure (effective stress)Kc,Kq,Kγ = constants General Shear Failure
For general shear failure, the ultimate bearing capacity is dependent on the footing shape:
qu=cNc+qNq+0.5γc BNγ
qu=1.3cNc+qNq+0.4γc BNγ
qu=1.3cNc+qNq+0.3γc BNγ Local Shear Failure
For local shear failure, it is assumed that the soil cohesion is reduced:
cˉ = 32c Similar to 'general shear failure', the ultimate bearing capacity is dependent on the footing shape:
qu =cˉNc′ + qNq′ +0.5γcBNγ′
qu = 1.3cˉNc′ + qNq′ + 0.4γc BNγ′
qu=1.3cNc′+qNq′+0.3γc BNγ′ Allowable Bearing Capacity
A factor of safety (FoS) is incorporated into the footing design, which reduces the ultimate bearing capacity. FoS generally varies anywhere from 1.5 ~ 3, depending on the uncertainty in soil properties. The allowable bearing capacity is calculated as:
qallowable =FoSqu Effect of Water Table
The equations above assume the groundwater table depth is much greater than the footing width B. However, in other cases wherein the water table is near or above the footing, the subsoil becomes saturated and the unit weight of the submerged soil is reduced, resulting in a decrease in the soil's ultimate bearing capacity.
Case 1: Water table is above the footing base
q = γ(Df−D) + γ′D γc = γ′ = γsat−γw Case 2: Water table is at the footing base
q = γ Df Additionally, γ in the third term of the bearing capacity equations should be replaced by γ'.
Case 3: Water table is below the footing base
For D≤B: γ = γave =B1[γ D + γ′(B−D)]For D > B: γ = unchanged References
- Foundations of Geotechnical Engineering by DIT Gillesania
- Principles of Geotechnical Engineering 7th Edition by Braja M. Das
Related Resources
Check out our full library of CalcTree templates here! - 3D Mohr's Circle
- Mohr's Circle for 2D Stresses
- Weight to Volume relationships in soils