This article discusses and summarizes the basic design procedure for timber elements as outlined in EN Eurocode 5, which covers the design approaches, calculation, and analysis of structural strengths and material properties of timber materials. Every country, sometimes even states, has unique design methods, which often leads to scattered calculations, incoherency in design, and wasted time. As such, this piece was written to help engineers who may need to use Eurocode 5 and wish to develop a basic understanding of its concepts without reading the entire document.

Ultimate Strength Limit State

EC5 [1] uses a similar approach to AS1684 and AS1720 for ultimate strength limit state design. The general equation for calculating design capacities is:
﻿
﻿
Rk is the characteristic design capacity and γM is the “partial factor”. This parameter accounts for differences due to material type in design value calculation:
Modification Factors
The modification factor kmod in EC5 accounts for the effect of moisture content and load duration using different categories of ‘service class’ and ‘load-duration class’. There are 3 service classes and 5 load-duration classes; climatic loads like snow and wind vary between countries therefore, EC5 allows nation annexes to assign country-specific load-duration classes in the national annexes:
Effects of other parameters are not accounted for by kmod in EC5. Instead, each expression to be satisfied supplements its own modification factor. For example, for design compression capacity parallel to the grain, AS1720 uses Nd,c > ϕ k1 k4 k6 k12 f’c A­c where k1,k4, k6, and k12 are modification factors; EC5 uses σc,90,d < kc,90fc,90,d where kc,90 is the modification factor accounting for the effect of load configuration, splitting, and deformation. The theory behind these equations is the same (as they both use elastic analysis), but the selection criteria for modification factors and their numerical values are different.
A component covered in EC5 but not in AS1684 or AS1720 is the cracking of timber. The strength performance of timber systems mainly depends on shear connectors (joints and fasteners) that create combined actions between adjacent members. These connections are often the first to fail upon reaching the ultimate strength limit. Clause 6.1.7 of EC5 accounts for the influence of cracks for shear resistance of members in bending using the factor k­cr, which varies depending on the type of timber material.

Serviceability Limit State

Deflection limits in EC5 are also based on elastic analysis methods, similar to Australian standards. It recommends the use of deflection limits relative to the beam span and directs engineers to refer to national annexes for specific values.
It does not offer any structural models like AS1684 and instead provides formulae for modulus of elasticity, slip moduli, and shear moduli to be used to calculate deflections. The most significant difference between EC5 and the Australian standards is the inclusion of vibration control for timber flooring systems.

Fundamental Frequency f1

Fundamental frequency, or natural frequency, is an inherent property of all materials; it is the frequency at which objects vibrate in free, unrestrained conditions. When the frequency of external forces (including human activities, such as walking or running, machinery, wind, seismic activity, etc.) is equal to the fundamental frequency, resonance occurs.
In structures, resonance must be avoided at all costs. It leads to amplified deflections and perceivable oscillations that cause annoyance and discomfort. In extreme cases, total structural collapse may occur. The Tacoma Bridge incident is an example of structural failure due to resonance: the frequency of the wind loads caused vibrations equal to the fundamental frequency of the bridge. It led to uncontrollable deflections and the bridge eventually collapsed. EC5 provides a formula for estimating the fundamental frequency using the floor’s material properties (bending stiffness, mass, and span). However, studies have shown differences when compared to experimentally obtained values. Engineers should use experimentally verified values if they are available.
﻿
To prevent such phenomena, EC5 suggests that the fundamental frequency of residential flooring systems should be above 8 Hz. Studies show that the frequency of day-to-day human activities is between 1 - 8 Hz [2,3], hence the flooring systems are at risk if their fundamental frequency is within this range.