Foundations are unsung heros of structures, rarely seen, but critical for structural integrity. They are often aesthetically underwhelming compared to more flashy structural components above ground, but foundations are responsible for the structure’s stability and the safety of its occupants. This guide specifically outlines procedures for the design of a very common type of foundation, pad footings.

The primary role of a foundation is to transfer loads from the superstructures above to the ground below. Different types of foundations have been developed to accommodate different ground and loading conditions, and are generally categorized as either deep or shallow. Shallow foundations transfer loads to the upper soil layers which are relatively shallow compared to the effective size of the bearing area. If the upper soil layer is not strong enough, deep foundations can be used to reach stronger soil layers deeper in the ground, much deeper in comparison to the pad’s width. Their behavior, and therefore the method of design for shallow foundations, is different from deep foundations.

The design of a foundation varies from project to project and depends on various factors such as the design of the structure above, applied loads, site accessibility, proximity to nearby structures, soil conditions, budget, etc. Pad foundations are commonly used in structures with smaller heights which have relatively small deck areas supported by each column, like residential dwellings or single-story industrial buildings.

ad foundation design follows AS 3600 [1] and AS 2159 [2]. The table below shows import parameters and their definitions that are used constantly throughout this guide:

The first step in designing a pad footing is calculating the ultimate bearing capacity of the surrounding soil (qu), a nominal pressure at the foundation base at which the soil fails. The actual pressure beneath a foundation is often not uniform, but the nominal pressure takes the overall distribution into account, provided that a compliant set of equations are used end to end of the design procedure. The most relevant ultimate bearing capacity formula are those proposed by Terzaghi and Hansen. For cohesionless soils, Terzaghi and Hansen’s equations are equal; however, for cohesive soils, Terzaghi’s equations are more conservative than Hensen’s. Generally, Terzaghi’s equations only apply to shallow footings of certain shapes (i.e. circular, strip, and square), but Hansen’s equation applies to all.

s = shape factor accounts for the shape of the footing

d = depth factor accounts for the depth of the footing base

i = inclination factor accounts for cases where loads act other than normal

g = ground factor accounts for the slope of the ground

b = base factor accounts for the inclined surface of the footing

Generally, the ultimate bearing capacity is reduced by a ‘factor of safety’ to obtain the allowable bearing capacity qa. The allowable bearing capacity is used as the limit for the design of the footing instead of the ultimate bearing capacity for safety. This factor of safety generally varies between 2 ~ and 4, depending on the type of structure.

The required footing area can be calculated by rearranging the ‘pressure = force/area’ equation. P represents the column axial force, which includes the loads transferred from the superstructure and the column’s self-weight. For footings, the shorter side is referred to as width (denoted B), and the longer side as length (denoted L).

You should note that some of the bearing capacity coefficients depend on the pad geometry. Therefore, you often need to do a bearing capacity ‘check’ after the first design iteration.

A footing is responsible for the transfer of loads to the surrounding stratum and soil. Much like a beam or a slab, footings are subject to flexure and shear forces. Therefore, reinforcements are necessary.

Find the minimum requirement steel reinforcement:

AS3600 Clause 2.1.3.1 :

where,

Then, select the appropriate bar size and the number of bars required, considering the cover on each side.

The critical flexural failure (or two-way shear failure) occurs at the face of the column. The flexural strength of the footing can be calculated below.

AS3600 Clause 8.1:

Clause 1.7:

Clause 8.1.3:

Critical shear failure (or one-way shear failure) occurs at some distance away from the face of the column. The shear strength of the footing (specifically the concrete) can be calculated below.

AS3600 Clause 8.2.4.1:

This section of the standard presents two methods for estimating the ultimate shear strength of concrete. In cases where the following are satisfied, a simplified method outlined in Clause 8.2.4.3 may be used:

No prestressed elements

No axial tension or torsion

The aggregate particle size of the concrete > 10mm

In such cases, the following can be assumed as per Clause 8.2.4.3:

If the above conditions are not met, then Clauses 8.2.4.2.1 ~ 3 must be followed.

The calculated flexural and shear strength must satisfy the following:

- [1] Standards Australia, AS 3600-2018: Concrete Structures. Standards Australia, 2018.

- [2] Standards Australia, AS 2159-2009: Piling - Design and Installation. Standards Australia, 2009.